Families with infants and toddlers bear the brunt of our nation’s child care crisis in terms of lack of supply, high prices, and low quality, but research indicates there are concrete ways to improve the situation, a new brief from Opportunities Exchange finds.
Defining the problem accurately is key to finding solutions. Most data on child care supply don’t distinguish by age of child (a problem in itself), but those that do show infants and toddlers suffer the most:
Subsidy allocations contribute to the problem. Only 28% of federal Child Care and Development Fund spending and 8.5% of Head Start funding go to children under age 3, despite the fact that 46% of low-income children under age six with working parents are infants and toddlers. CCDF and Head Start are the largest source of funding for this age group—often the only source, the brief notes. What’s more, market prices—on which subsidies are based—are lower than the actual cost of delivering infant-toddler care. Yet providers can’t raise market prices, because they already are too high for families to pay in many cases.
What are the solutions? The brief suggests several:
It’s good news that our country has made strides in improving the affordability, quality and supply of care for children older than three. Now it’s time to turn our attention to the youngest among us.
There are many great ideas in this brief; we encourage you to check it out here!
Sarah Crow • Apr 14, 2020
This week, Child Trends announced its new pilot effort to collect kindergarten readiness data.
Sarah Crow • Sep 25, 2019
We’re thrilled to release our first paper today, along with California Children’s Trust, discussing how the Medi-Cal system can best support young children as they grow up.
Cinthia Diaz • Apr 28, 2020
California’s stay-at-home order is making vital family support services harder to provide to vulnerable families – but the nurses, social workers and other professionals who provide parenting support have found ways to pivot their work to meet this moment.